|
PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS OF LOS ANGELES
ENDORSES
**BARACK
OBAMA FOR
PRESIDENT**
Just over 60% of our voting
membership chose to endorse Barack Obama for
President
in the California Primary on
Tuesday. Though some of our eligible
voters wanted to
refrain from making an
endorsement, no one wanted to endorse Hillary
Clinton.
With more progressive
candidates Congressman Dennis Kucinich
and former Senator
John Edwards out of the running,
we now face a choice between two candidates with similar
voting records on Iraq war funding, trade, civil
liberties, and Supreme Court Justice
appointments.
Both Obama and
Clinton voted to fund the Iraq occupation and renew the
Patriot Act; both also voted to oppose Bush
administration Supreme Court appointments, to gut
CAFTA, to grant constitutional rights to Guantanamo
detainees, and to oppose expansion of FISA
spying. Both have pledged
support for the Employee Free Choice Act, a strategic
piece of legislation that would make it easier to
organize the workplace and build a strong union
movement. Both propose a time-table for partial
withdrawal from Iraq and both need to be pushed to end
the occupation entirely.
Obama, however, opposed the Iraq
War Authorization from the start, delivering a powerful
anti-war speech while in the public eye, serving in the
Illinois legislature. "The consequences of
war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable,"
Obama told a Chicago rally in
2002.
Clinton , on the other hand, failed to
even read the National Intelligence Estimate, a document
prepared by US intelligence officials charged with
examining the justification for a US invasion.
Had Clinton read the document,
she would have noted the boxed and highlighted
objections made by intelligence analysts who challenged
the Bush administration's accusations that Iraq had
WMD's. Not only did Clinton
irresponsibly vote for the Iraq War Authorization, she
also voted against the Levin Amendment, which would have
required Bush to seek UN approval for an attack on Iraq.
More recently, Clinton, unlike
Obama, voted for the Kyl-Lieberman Amendment,
legislation declaring a wing of the Iranian military a
terrorist organization. Surely,
Clinton knew a vote for this amendment would afford Bush
an excuse for expanding the Iraq war to
Iran. Meanwhile, Clinton voted
against a ban on cluster bombs, munitions that blind
children attracted to the tiny bomblets that litter
places like southern Lebanon. Obama
voted to ban cluster bombs.
Some might argue
we need a woman President to break through the
glass ceiling -
to inspire young girls across
America to scale new heights.
Clearly, a woman President would be an important
first, but we prefer a woman at the top who uses her
experience and wisdom to say NO to imperialist wars,
thus inspiring young girls worldwide to become peace
makers and critical thinkers, not warriors and panderers
to false patriotism.
Obama as President would catapult
a man of African heritage, a man who spent his childhood
among Muslims, to the center of the
world stage, presenting a new face for America – and
possibly a new US relationship to the rest of the
world.
Our hope is that Obama's
background in community organizing and constitutional
scholarship will inspire him to honor the balance of
powers, shun the concept of the unitary executive,
disavow signing statements, restore habeas corpus and
respectfully engage the legislature as an equal branch
of government.
Going forward, however, it is our
job as progressives to make our agenda,
not a single candidate, the focus of our work –
and to engage the youth inspired by Obama to join us in
creating a more just society.
Regardless of who is in office, we must persevere
to cut funding for the US occupation of Iraq, stop an
attack on Iran, indict the war criminals - and
on the domestic reform front -- lobby for single-payer
health care, support media diversification, protect the
integrity of our vote, publicly finance elections, and
empower the global union
movement.
Vote for Barack Obama on Tuesday, February
5th.
## ##
Sign Our
Petition for Equal Access
Resolution in favor of
ALL CANDIDATES
of
the major parties being included in nationally
broadcast debates
Whereas
the democracy of our country is dependent on the free
and open exchange of ideas and information,
And,
whereas the media conglomerates and corporate interests,
driven by shareholder profits, are using
the public air waves to
limit access and monopolize the broadcasting commons,
And
whereas these media conglomerates and corporate
interests are undermining the public interest to
be fully informed about critical issues, thus declaring
themselves to be private entities who can
limit debate through arbitrarily set conditions for
participation ,
Be it
resolved that Progressive Democrats of Los Angeles shall
support this resolution to request that the Democratic
National Committee REQUIRE that the broadcasting
networks who use the public air waves include all
presidential candidates in all nationally televised
debates.
Co-sponsored
by:
1. Linda
Sutton, 41st AD Delegate, PDLA- Endorsements,
Progressive Caucus- Media
2. Dr. Bill
Honigman, PDA California State Coordinator
3.
Marcy Winograd, Pres.,
PDLA; Exec Bd. Member, California Democratic Party (41st
AD)
4. Brad
Parker, Officer, Progressive Caucus of the California
Democratic Party
5. Lila
Garrett, KPFK Host of "Connect the Dots"
6. Judy
Alter, Dir, Protect California Ballots, Delegate-At-Lg,
Election Defense Alliance
7. William
Floyd, President, Santa Monica Peace Club
8. Dorothy
Reik, President, Progressive Democrats of the Santa
Monica Mts.
9. Barbara
Gluck, Director, Global Light Network
10. Peter
Thottam, Esq., Executive Director, Los Angeles
Impeachment Center
11. Robin
Gibson, Co-Founder, L.A. Election Protection
Taskforce
12. Ann
Hiller, Treasurer, PDLA
13. Barbara
Levin, Secretary PDLA and Founder of PDA-CA34
Chapter
14. Mervis
Reissig, PDLA Endorsement Chair, PDA National Coord
Congressional Districts
15. Michael
Jay, Delegate, 42nd AD, PDLA
16. Lauren
Steiner, SoCalGrassroots, PDLA
17. Lillian
Laskin, Democratic Club of Westside Progressives,PLDA
Endorsements
18. Maureen
Cruise, 41st AD Delegate, Pacific Palisades Dems, LA
County DP Alt, PDLA
18. Ahjamu
Makalani, Progressive Caucus, PDLA
19. Bruce
Campbell, West LA Democratic Club, PDLA-Chair
Environment/GlobalWarming
20. Marilyn
Noyes, PDLA
21. Michael
Millman
22. Tom
Williams, PDLA
23. Laurette
Healey, PDLA
24. Kim
Kaufman, PDLA
25. Margery
Epstein, PDLA
26. Sylvia
Moore, PDLA
27. Rochelle
Laur, PDLA
28. Susan B.
Haskell, Delegate, 41st AD, Pacific Palisades Democratic
Club
29. Margie
Murray, PDLA, Valley Democrats United, 41st
AD delegate
30. David
Swanson, PDA National Board Member
31. Alicia
Morgan, PDLA
32. Christine Rowe, Valley West Democrats,
Valley Grassroots for Democracy
33. Marr Nealon, NELA Democratic Club
34. Michael Butler, West LA Democratic
Club
35. Flo A
Weber, PDA Ventura County,Valley Democrats United,
Valley West Dem Club
36. Maureen
Louise O'Connell, PDLA
37.
Laurel Burik, Progressive Democrat boycotting major
media, DCCC, voting Kucinich
38. Wayne
Williams, CDP Elected Delegate from 41st AD, PDA
Advisory Board, VDU Board
39. Charles
Coleman Jr., Teacher, PDLA, CA Delegate, 39th AD
40.
Patricia Graczyk
41. John
Azevedo, declined to state
42. Wendy
Block, Valley Democrats United
43. Sharon
Jimenez, President, Icon Imaging PR
44. Lisa
Miller, Democrat
45.
Ulis Williams, Pacific Palisades Democratic Club,
PDLA
46.
Sandra Sunshine Williams, PDLA
47.
Alice Lynn, Delegate, 41st A.D., Vice President, Pacific
Palisades Democratic Club
48.
Scot Albert, PDA Foothill District
49. Jody
Lozon - Los Angeles (50)
50.
Annette St. John Lawrence,Corres. Sec. Valley Democrats
United, Progressive Caucus
51.
Carol Hirshfield, Ph.D., PDLA
52.
Babette Wieland, Progressive Democrat
53. Mary
Pallant, Delegate, 41st AD, PDA/VC
54.
Tobi Dragert, Los Angeles, CA
55.
Anthony Saidy, PDLA
56.
Lydia Cornell 57. Paul Hayeland 58. Jack
Mulholland
59.
Rosalind Wolf, PDLA, Pacific Palisades Democratic Club
60.
Paul Newman, PDLA, Santa Monica
61.
David Villar PDLA
62.
Rebecca Freese, PDLA
63.
Pennie Dobkin
64.
Sharon M. Klein, PDLA
65.
Suzanne Benning, PDLA
66.
Jamshid Ebrahimzadeh,PDLA
67.
Arlene Nilsson, PDLA, WLA
68.
Vinayak, PDLA
69. Susan K.
Baritell, Progressive Dems Sonoma Cty,
Secretary/Steering Committee
Alternate,
Sonoma County Democratic Central Committee
70.
Ellis Perlman, PDLA, Santa Monica Democratic Club, 41st
AD delegate
71.
Ruth H. Strauss MD
72.
Daniel L. Sutton, CPF
73. Dr. Jean
Ottina, concerned Democratic voter
74.
Bob Handy, Director Region10, California Democratic
Party
75. Michael
Stabile, Hubert H. Humphrey Democratic Club, 56 AD,
Delegate 39 th CD
76.
William Crain, Co-State Coordinator PDA
Montana
77. Terry
Johnson
78.
Ruth Hull-Richter, Chairman, Patrick Henry Democratic
Club of America
79.
Alexandar Hull-Richter, Director, Chief- Western
Affairs, National Youth Rights Assoc.
80.
Natasha Hull-Richter, President, National Youth Rights
Association-Orange County.
81.
Mark Hull-Richter, Executive Director, Patrick Henry
Democratic Club of America
82.
Gay Lannon
83. Tighe
Barry, Delegate 41st AD, member CodePink Women For Peace
84.
Anna Weldon, American Citizen
85. Deborah
Studer-Teal, Democratic
86.
Susan Kopicki, Democracy for America - Orange
County
87. Carlos
Richardson III, San Diego Metro PDA
88. Cindy
Asner, CA Delegate 42nd AD
89.
Gail Wirth, Pacific Palisades Democratic Club
90.
Mary Jacobs, PDLA
91.
Dinah Mason, PDSB, organizer Santa Barbara Impeach
Bush-Cheney Townhall Meetup
92. Mark
Lipman, artist/activist
93.
Gary Krasnoff Santa Barbara,
Veterans for Peace, Democrat 94. Juanita
Chatham Santa Barbara Democrat
95.
Tania Anderson, Reseda, CA D-27
96. Colleen
Fernald, PDA, PD Sonoma County, Progressive
Caucus
97.
Susan Smiley, Activist for PDA and HCA
98.
William Smiley, Activist for PDA and HCA
99. Shirley
Howland, Lake County Peace Action and PDA
100. Nancy Knipe
, 28th Assembly District
101. Dr.
Gilberto Robledo, Santa Barbara Progressive Democrats
102. Joy
Robledo, Santa Barbara Progressive
Democrats
103. Brian
Levy, member PDA Ventura County & Simi
Valley/Moorpark Democratic Club
104. Janis
McQuain, PDA, Alliance for Democracy, World Can't Wait,
Topanga Peace All.
105. JoAnn
Saccato, Clearlake, CA
106.
Ralph
Erickson, LA
County
Central Committee., PDLA
107. Judith
Iam
108.
Margaret
Koren RN, Dept of Peace Team leader for CA Congressional
District 1
109. James
Evans, PDA, Lake County Peace Action, Dem Club,
Democratic Central Cmte.
110. Joye
Swan, Ph.D., 42nd AD Delegate CDP, President, PDA-SFV
111. Luette
Forrest
112 . Jill
Daskalakis
113.
David
Sonneborn, National and Orange County PDA, So Cal
Grassroots, DPOC Central
Committee and E board, 71st AD delegate
114. Richard
Wizensky, PGPSCC Sonoma County Green Party
115. Sandra
Macneill, PDA, PD Sonoma County
116. Margie
Murray, PDLA, Valley Democrats United, 41st
AD delegate
117.
Joan Hudson-Miller, PDLA, Democratic Club of Westside
Progressives
118
. Michelle
Weiner
119.
Ed Pitzer,
PDA 36TH Chapter
120. Anita
Fieldman, Chair, Progressive Democrats of Marin
###
http://www.gopetition.com/online/16488.html
**Next PDLA Meetings - Feb. 16, March 15, April
19
10:15 - 1
PM
Westside Pavillion (Overland &
Pico)
Community Room/Third Floor/Behind the Food
Court
Email PDLAvote@aol.com for
agendas.
PROGRESSIVE
DEMOCRATS
of LOS
ANGELES
PRESENTS
THE PROPOSITIONS…..
A
Progressive Guide to Voting on FEBRUARY 5, 2008.
(
Want to be a poll worker? Go to www.lavote.net)
Progressive
Democrats of Los Angeles' Endorsement Committee studies
ballot propositions, examining each proposition on its
merits, as well as its spin-off
effects. Recommendations by the Committee are voted
on by the entire membership. Below you'll
find PDLA's recommendations for the February
5, 2008 ballot:
NO
on PROP 91: Roads, Roads, Roads
Not
this again. This is a repeat of a bad idea that
already passed.
Prop 91 will only serve to further erode the
state's budget, while protecting the road-building
industry. Anyone heard of alternative forms of
transportation?
YES
on PROP 92: Community College
Funding
Proposition
92 changes the current minimum education funding
requirement into two separate requirements: one for K-12
schools and one for community colleges.
Funding
for community colleges would be based on eligible
student population, rather than a set percentage of the
larger education budget.
If
enacted, this measure would lower community college
education fees from $20 per unit to $15 per unit, while
requiring a two-thirds majority of the legislature to
increase fee levels.
When
the Legislature doubled student fees in 2003-04,
lawmakers also cut the state's contribution to community
colleges by an equal amount. This meant that the
community colleges were no better off and that the
students paid more. Hundreds of thousands of students
failed to enroll or dropped out.
Prop
92 will ensure an affordable college education for all
Californians.
NO
on Prop 93 – Sweetheart Term Limits
Ever since 1990,
when Californians passed a term limit measure, members
of the assembly and senate have been restricted to 14
years in the legislature, six years (3 terms) in the
assembly, eight years (2 terms) in the senate.
Under Prop 92, lawmakers could only serve 12 total years
in the legislature, but those 12 years could be served
in either one or both houses.
If Prop 92
passes, the real winners will be Assembly Speaker Fabian
Nunez and Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata.
Built into 93 is a "transition period" to ensure their
employment BEYOND their allotted term. Current
lawmakers can serve a total of up to 12 years in
whichever house they are currently involved.
The corruption
that was the primary reason for enactment of the term
limits in the first place is alive and well as the
corporations continue to pour money into the coffers of
incumbents of both parties.
Let's face
it. The progressive agenda will forever be blocked
as long as the interests of corporations hold sway over
those of the people. And the politicians who have stood
in the way of Clean Money, and single payer health care,
and who have refused to allow a re-introduction of
impeachment into the state legislature will have their
terms extended.
And what about
those Republicans due to be termed out? Prop 93
will give them several more years in office, thus making
it impossible for a progressive to grab their seat.
No on Props 94,
95, 96, & 97 – Indian Gambling
Expansion
We oppose the
Indian gambling (not "gaming") contracts for a few
reasons. First of all, profits from the
slot-machine-expansion will enrich the coffers of only
four tribes. What about the others who've been
cut out of the deal?
Secondly, the
four tribes who will profit oppose card-check
certification at their non-union shops or
casinos. That's why UNITE Here, the hotel
workers union, opposes these props.
********************
Volunteer
at the LA National
Impeachment
Center
Saturdays,
2
- 6 PM
Peace
Center |